Advertisements
in

Authors Sue Anthropic for Using Pirated Books to Train AI

Authors Sue Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Pirated Books for AI Training

Authors Battle Anthropic Over Alleged Pirated Book Use
Authors Battle Anthropic Over Alleged Pirated Book Use

Anthropic, the startup known for its AI chatbot Claude, faces a new legal battle as three authors—Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson—have filed a class action lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit, lodged in a California federal court on August 19, accuses Anthropic of infringing on copyright by allegedly using hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books, including the plaintiffs’ works, to develop its AI technology. This marks the second time Anthropic has been sued over such claims, intensifying scrutiny over its data practices.

Lawsuit Accuses Anthropic of Systematic Copyright Theft

The recent class action lawsuit against Anthropic, filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson, alleges that the startup has engaged in widespread copyright infringement. The plaintiffs claim that Anthropic, a company backed by Amazon and other major tech players, has used pirated versions of their books to train its AI model, Claude. According to the lawsuit, these unauthorized copies were downloaded from illegal sources and incorporated into the model’s training data, constituting a direct violation of copyright laws.

This legal action is the second instance of litigation faced by Anthropic over copyright issues. The lawsuit argues that the company’s business model fundamentally relies on the illicit acquisition and use of copyrighted material, raising significant concerns about intellectual property rights in the rapidly evolving AI industry. The plaintiffs seek legal redress for the alleged misuse of their works and are calling for stricter regulations to prevent such violations.

Advertisements

Impact on AI Development and Copyright Law

The lawsuit highlights a growing debate over the ethical and legal boundaries of using copyrighted material to train AI models. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent, the question of whether training datasets that include copyrighted works fall under fair use or constitute infringement is increasingly contested. This case, along with others involving AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, could set important precedents for how copyright law is applied to AI technologies.

With major tech companies like Google, Salesforce, and Amazon involved in funding Anthropic, the outcome of this lawsuit could have broad implications for the future of AI development. The decision may influence how AI developers source training data and could lead to changes in legal standards governing the use of copyrighted content in the AI industry.

Follow Wat-Not on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Advertisements
Advertisements
Avatar

Written by Wat-Not Staff

Leave a Reply

Avatar

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

NIP Group partners with BTG Homeinns

NIP Group Enters The Hospitality Sector By Partnering With BTG Homeinns

NIP Group Teams Up with BTG for Hospitality

NIP Group Teams Up with BTG Homeinns for Hospitality Entry

Advertisements