Advertisements
in

Taylor Swift Subpoenaed in Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni’s Legal Battle – What’s Really Going On?

Inside Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni’s Heated Courtroom Battle – Why Taylor Swift Is Being Dragged Into the Controversy!

Taylor Swift Pulled Into Blake Lively’s Legal Battle!
Taylor Swift Pulled Into Blake Lively’s Legal Battle!

Pop superstar Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed in the ongoing legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni over their film It Ends With Us. While Swift’s involvement in the movie was minimal, her name has now been pulled into the controversy, sparking widespread media attention.

Why Was Taylor Swift Subpoenaed?

According to reports, Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has issued a subpoena for Swift to appear as a witness in the case. However, Swift’s team has strongly denied any significant connection to the film beyond licensing her song “My Tears Ricochet” for its soundtrack.

A spokesperson for Swift stated: > “Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release.”

Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni – The Legal Battle

The lawsuit stems from Blake Lively’s allegations that Baldoni sexually harassed her on set. She filed a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department, accusing Baldoni of misconduct and retaliation. In response, Baldoni denied the allegations and countersued Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for defamation, extortion, and invasion of privacy.

Advertisements

The Role of Taylor Swift in the Case

Despite Swift’s limited involvement, Baldoni’s legal team has claimed that Lively used Swift’s song as leverage in the dispute over the film’s production. Baldoni alleges that Lively held the movie hostage with the song’s inclusion, further complicating the legal battle.

What’s Next?

The case is set to go to trial in March 2026, and it remains unclear whether Swift will actually be required to testify. Legal experts argue that subpoenaing celebrities without direct relevance to the case could be a publicity stunt rather than a necessary legal move.

Conclusion

While Taylor Swift’s name has been dragged into the controversy, her team insists she has no direct involvement in the legal dispute. As the trial approaches, the focus will likely shift back to the core allegations between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.

 

Advertisements

Follow Wat-Not on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Advertisements
Avatar

Written by Nidhish Waghmare

Advertisements
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Avatar

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Advertisements
Can Dogs Eat Bananas? Benefits, Risks & How to Feed Them Safely

Can Dogs Eat Bananas? Everything You Need to Know

Advertisements